Collective Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 November 2020
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- After the HumanCulture, Theory and Criticism in the 21st Century, pp. 252 - 276Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Collective Works Cited
Adey, P. (2010). Aerial Life: Spaces, Mobilities, Affects. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, G. (2007). The Coming Community, trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2008). Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the “New Materialism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahuja, N. (2017). Colonialism. In Alaimo, Stacy, ed., Gender: Matter. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan, 237–52.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. (2017). Your Shell on Acid: Material Immersion, Anthropocene Dissolves. In Grusin, Richard, ed., Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 89–120.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. and Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: Emerging Models of Materiality in Feminist Theory. In Alaimo, S. and Hekman, S., eds., Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1–22.Google Scholar
Allington, D., Brouillette, S., and Golumbia, D. (2016). Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of the Digital Humanities. In Los Angeles Review of Books (1 May). Online. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/Google Scholar
Aloi, G. and McHugh, S. (Forthcoming). Introduction: Art and the Ontological Turn. In Aloi, G. and McHugh, S., eds., Posthumanism in Art and Science: A Reader. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation), trans. Ben Brewster. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London, UK: New Left Books, 121–73.Google Scholar
Angerer, M-L. (2017). Ecology of Affect: Intensive Milieus and Contingent Encounters, trans. Gerrit Jackson. Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Atanasoski, N. and Kalindi, V. (2019). Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. (2017). The Poetics of Transgenerational Trauma. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Atzmon, L. and Boradkar, P. (eds.). (2017). Encountering Things: Design and Theories of Things. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bacigalupi, P. (2004). The People of Sand and Slag. The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, 106(2), 6–29.Google Scholar
Badmington, N. (2000). Introduction: Approaching Posthumanism. In Badmington, N., ed., Posthumanism. New York, NY: Palgrave, 1–10.Google Scholar
Badmington, N. (2006). Posthumanism. In Malpas, Simon and Wake, Paul, eds., The Routledge Companion to Critical Theory. London, UK: Routledge, 240–1.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthuman Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, F. (2014). The Brave Side of the Digital Humanities. Differences, 25(1), 64–78.Google Scholar
Bates, T. (2013). HumanThrush Entanglements: Homo Sapiens as a Multi-species Ecology. Philosophy, Activism, Nature (10), 36–45.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations, trans. P. Foss, P. Patton, and P. Beitchman. New York, NY: Semiotext[e].Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. (1993). The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena, trans. J. Benedict. London, UK: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. (2017). Transgender Matters. In Alaimo, Stacy, ed., Gender: Matter. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan, 65–77.Google Scholar
Behar, K. (ed.). (2016). Object-Oriented Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Belsey, C. (2002). Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, T. (2015). Cultural Studies and the Culture Concept. Cultural Studies, 29(4), 546–68.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. (2008). The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Best, S. (2009). The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: Putting Theory into Action and Animal Liberation into Higher Education. Journal of Critical Animal Studies, 7(1), 9–52.Google Scholar
Blackman, L. (2012). Immaterial Bodies: Affect, Embodiment, Mediation. London, UK: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bloch, E. (1986). The Principle of Hope, trans. N. Plaice, S. Plaice, and P. Knight. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bostrom, N. (2005). Transhumanist Values. In Adams, F., ed., Ethical Issues for the 21st Century. Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center, 3–14.Google Scholar
Bould, M. and Miéville, C. (eds.) (2009). Red Planets: Marxism and Science Fiction. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2018). Posthuman Critical Theory. In Braidotti, R. and Hlavajova, M., eds. The Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury Academic, 339–42.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. and Hlavajova, M. (eds.). (2018). The Posthuman Glossary. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. and Vermeulen, T. (2014). Borrowed Energy. Frieze. Online. https://frieze.com/article/borrowed-energyGoogle Scholar
Brassier, R. (2007). Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brassier, R. (2013). Unfree Improvisation/Compulsive Freedom. Mattin.org. Online. www.mattin.org/essays/unfree_improvisation-compulsive_freedom.htmlGoogle Scholar
Braun, B. (2007). Biopolitics and the Molecularization of Life. Cultural Geographies, 14(1), 6–28.Google Scholar
Brooke, J. H. (1971). Organic Synthesis and the Unification of Chemistry – A Reappraisal. The British Journal for the History of Science, 5(4), 363–92.Google Scholar
Brown, D. L. (2018). Can the “Immortal Cells” of Henrietta Lacks Sue for Their Own Rights? Washington Post 25 Jun. Online. www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/06/25/can-the-immortal-cells-of-henrietta-lacks-sue-for-their-own-rights/Google Scholar
Bryant, L. R. (2011). The Ontic Principle: Outline of an Object-Oriented Ontology. In Bryant, L. R., Srnicek, N. and Harman, G., eds., The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Victoria, AU: re-press, 261–78.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1992). Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism.” In Butler, J. and Scott, J. W., eds., Feminists Theorize the Political. New York, NY: Routledge, 3–21.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London, UK: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. (2016). Still Waiting for the “Post” to Arrive: Elizabeth Cook-Lynn and the Imponderables of American Indian Postcoloniality. Wicazo Sa Review, 31(1), 75–89.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. (2011). The Transit of Empire: Indigenous Critiques of Colonialism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2007). What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative? In MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L., eds., Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Peformativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 311–57.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. (Director). (2009). Avatar [Motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. (Director). (1984). The Terminator [Motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Orion Pictures.Google Scholar
Canavan, G. and Hageman, A. (2016). Introduction: “Global Weirding.” Paradoxa, 28, 7–13.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (2008). Knowledge of Life, ed. Marrati, P. and Meyers, T., trans. Geraoulanous, S. and Ginsberg, D.. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (1994). A Vital Rationalist: Selected Writings of Georges Canguilhem, ed. Delaporte, François, trans. Goldhammer, A.. New York, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Castree, N. (2014). The Anthropocene and Geography I: The Back Story. Geography Compass, 8(7),436–49.Google Scholar
Castree, N. (2014). The Anthropocene and Geography III: Future Directions. Geography Compass, 8(7),464–76.Google Scholar
Castree, N. (2014). Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current Contributions. Geography Compass, 8(7),450–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catts, O., and Zurr, I. (2018). Artists Working with Life (Sciences) in Contestable Settings. YISR: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 43(1),40–53. Online.Google Scholar
Catts, O., and Zurr, I. (2005). Big Pigs, Small Wings: On Genohype and Artistic Autonomy. Culture Machine, 7. Online. https://culturemachine.net/biopolitics/big-pigs-small-wings/Google Scholar
Catts, O., and Zurr, I. (2019). Biomass. In Nature: Cooper Hewitt Design Triennial Exhibition (2019). Online.Google Scholar
Catts, O., and Zurr, I. (2014). Countering the Engineering Mindset – The Conflict of Art and Synthetic Biology. In Calvert, J. and Ginsberg, D., eds., Synthetic Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press,Google Scholar
Catts, O., and Zurr, I. (2002). Growing Semi-Living Sculptures. Leonardo Magazine, 35(4), 365–70.Google Scholar
Catts, O., and Zurr, I. (2018). Vessels of Care and Control – The Citizens of Incubators. In Happe, K.E., Johnson, J., and Levina, M., eds., Biocitizenship: On Bodies, Belonging, and the Politics of Life. New York, YI: New York University Press, 255–73.Google Scholar
Cavarero, A. (2016). Inclinations: A Critique of Rectitude. Trans. Adam Sitze and Amanda Minervini. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chachra, D. (2015). Why I Am Not a Maker. The Atlantic (23 Jan). Online. www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/why-i-am-not-a-maker/384767/Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222.Google Scholar
Chen, M. Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ćirković, M. M. (2018). The Great Silence: Science and Philosophy of Fermi’s Paradox. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claire, S. (2016). On the Politics of “New Feminist Materialisms.” In Pitts-Taylor, V., ed., Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Materialism. New York, NY: New York University Press, 58–72.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. E., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. F., Fishman, J.R. and Shim, J. K. (eds.). (2010). Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Health, and Illness in the U.S. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, B. (2020). Gaian Systems: Lynn Margulis, Neocybernetics, and the End of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, B. (2002). Mediating The Fly: Posthuman Metamorphosis in the 1950s. Configurations 10(1),169–91.Google Scholar
Clarke, B. (2014). Neocybernetics and Narrative. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, B. (2008). Posthuman Metamorphosis: Narrative and Systems. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, B. and Rossini, M. (eds.). (2017). The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, B. and Rossini, M (2017). Preface: Literature, Posthumanism, and the Posthuman. In Clarke, B. and Rossini, M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, xi-xxii.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clough, P. T. (2007). The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Clute, J. (2015). 21st Century Science Fiction, edited by David G. Hartwell and Patrick Nielsen Hayden. The New York Review of Science Fiction, 328, 1, 4–6.Google Scholar
Clynes, M. and Kline, N. (1960). Cyborgs and Space. Astronautics (September), 26–27, 74–76.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. J. (ed.). (1996). Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2014). Death of the Posthuman: Essays on Extinction, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2017). Futures. In Clarke, B. and Rossini, M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 196–208.Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2010). The Linguistic Turn in Continental Philosophy. In Schrift, A.D., ed., Poststructuralism and Critical Theory’s Second Generation. Durham, NC: Acumen, 279–309.Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2017). We Have Always Been Post-Anthropocene: The Anthropocene Counterfactual. In Grusin, R., ed., Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2016). What is the Anthro-Political? In Cohen, T., Colebrook, C., and Miller, J. Hillis, Twilight of the Anthropocene Idols. London, UK: Open Humanities Press, 81–125.Google Scholar
Connor, S. (1989). Postmodernist Culture: An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary, 2nd. ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. (2008). Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. and Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Craps, S. (2017). Climate Change and the Art of Anticipatory Memory. Parallax, 23(4), 479–92.Google Scholar
Craps, S. Colebrook, C., Crownshaw, R., Kennedy, R., Nardizzi, V. and Wenzel, J. (2018). Memory Studies and the Anthropocene: A Roundtable. Memory Studies, 11(4), 498–515.Google Scholar
Crichton, M. (Director). (1973). Westworld [Motion picture]. Beverly Hills, CA: Metro Goldwyn Mayer (MGM).Google Scholar
Crow, J. M. (2018). Life 2.0: Inside the Synthetic Biology Revolution. Cosmos (17 April). Online. https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/life-2-0-inside-the-synthetic-biology-revolution/Google Scholar
Crutzen, P. and Stoermer, E. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.Google Scholar
Csicsery-Ronay, I. Jr., (2011). The Seven Beauties of Science Fiction. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
da Costa, B. and Philip, K. (eds.). (2008). Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (2008). On the Origin of Species. In Secord, J., ed., Evolutionary Writings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 105–211.Google Scholar
da Silva, D. F. (2007). Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1998). Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
de Castro, E. V. (2014). Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology, trans. Skafish, P.. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections beyond “Politics.” Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334–70.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1988). Bergsonism, trans. H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam. New York, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1992). Ethology: Spinoza and Us. In Crary, J. and Kwinter, S., eds., Incorporations, trans. Robert Hurley. New York, NY: Zone Books, 625–33.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life, trans. A. Boyman. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Massumi, B.. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F (1994). What Is Philosophy?, trans. H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deloria, V. Jr., (1999). Relativity, Relatedness, and Reality. In Deloria, B. et al., eds., Spirit and Reason: The Vine Deloria, Jr. Reader. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing, 32–39.Google Scholar
Deplazes-Zemp, A. (2012). The Conception of Life in Synthetic Biology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 757–74.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1996). Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, trans. E. Prenowitz. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. Differance. (1973). In Speech and Phenomena And Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, trans. D. B. Allison. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 129–60.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1991). “Eating Well,” or the Calculation of the Subject: An Interview with Jacques Derrida. In Cadava, E., ed., Who Comes After the Subject? New York, NY: Routledge, 96–119.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1982). The Ends of Man. In Bass, A., ed., Margins of Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2016). Of Grammatology, trans. G. Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1990). Some Statements and Truisms about Neo-Logisms, Newisms, Postisms, Parasitisms, and Other Small Seisms, trans. Anne Tomiche. In Carroll, D., ed., The States of “Theory”: History, Art, and Critical Discourse. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 63–94.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2005). Sovereignties in Question: The Poetics of Paul Celan, ed. Dutoit, T. and Pasanen, O.. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, trans. P. Kamuf. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1970). Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Macksey, R. and Donato, E., eds., The Languages of Criticism and The Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 247–72.Google Scholar
Despret, V. (2004). The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body and Society, 10(2–3), 111–34.Google Scholar
Dixon, D. and Straughan, E. (2010). Geographies of Touch/Touched by Geography. Geography Compass, 4(5), 449–59.Google Scholar
Drexler, K. E. (1990). Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Dumit, J. (2012). Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Eden, A. H., Moor, J. H., Søraker, J. H., and Steinhart, E. (eds.). (2012). Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ehlers, N., and Krupar, S. (2019). Deadly Biocultures: The Ethics of Life-making. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ehlers, N., and Krupar, S. (2014). Hope Logics: Biomedicine, Affective Conventions of Cancer, and the Governing of Biocitizenry. Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology, 22(3), 385–413.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. and Attridge, D. (eds.). (2011). Theory After “Theory.” London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. (2018). Antebellum Posthuman: Race and Materiality in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, E. (2017). Artificial Communication? The Production of Contingency by Algorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 46(4), 249–65.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2010). From Geological to Animal Nature in Hegel’s Idea of Life. Hegel-Studien, (44), 1–77.Google Scholar
Fishel, S. R. (2017). The Microbial State: Global Thriving and the Body Politic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Foster, T. (2005). The Souls of Cyberfolk: Posthumanism as Vernacular Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Gordon, Colin. ed., New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, trans. Macey, David. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar
Fowles, S. (2016). The Perfect Subject (Postcolonial Object Studies). Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Frabetti, F. (2012). Have the Humanities Always Been Digital? For an Understanding of the “Digital Humanities” in the Context of Originary Technicitys. In Berry, D., ed., Understanding Digital Humanities. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 161–71.Google Scholar
Fraiman, S. (2012). Pussy Panic versus Liking Animals: Tracking Gender in Animal Studies. Critical Inquiry, 39(1), 89–115.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2007). Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2000). Life Itself: Global Nature and the Genetic Imaginary. In Franklin, S., Lury, C., and Stacey, J., eds. Global Nature, Global Culture. London, UK: SAGE, 188–226.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. and Lock, M. (2001). Animation and Cessation. In Franklin, S. and Lock, M., eds., Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 3–22.Google Scholar
Freedman, C. (2000). Critical Theory and Science Fiction. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. London, UK: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What is Means to be Human, Past, Present and Future. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gessert, G. (2010). Green Light: Toward an Art of Evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A. (2001). Contagious Feelings: Pauline Hanson and the Epidemiology of Affect. Australian Humanities Review, 24. Online. http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2001/12/01/contagious-feelings-pauline-hanson-and-the-epidemiology-of-affect/Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. Cameron, J. and Healy, S. (2013). Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press,144–45.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. Cameron, J. and Healy, S. and Miller, E. (2015). Economy as Ecological Livelihood. In Gibson, K., Rose, D. and Fincher, R., eds., Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. New York: Punctum Books, 7–17.Google Scholar
Glanville, R. (2007). Try Again. Fail Again. Fail Better: The Cybernetics in Design and the Design in Cybernetics. Kybernetes, 36(9/10), 1173–206.Google Scholar
Glick, M.H. (2018). Infrahumanisms: Science, Culture, and the Making of Modern Non/Personhood. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez-Barris, M. (2017). The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1980). The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Graham, E. (2002). Representations of the Post/Human: Monsters, Aliens and Others in Popular Culture. Manchester, UK Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. and Seigworth, G. J. (2010). An Inventory of Shimmers. In Gregg, M. and Seigworth, G. J., eds., The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–25.Google Scholar
Grinspoon, D. (2016). Earth in Human Hands: Shaping Our Planet’s Future. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
Grusin, R. (2015). Introduction. In Grusin, R., ed., The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, vii-xxix.Google Scholar
Grusin, R. (2010). Premediation: Affect and Mediality after 9/11. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grusin, R. (ed.). (2015). The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Guthman, J. (2014). Doing Justice to Bodies? Reflections on Food Justice, Race, and Biology. Antipode, 46, 1153–71.Google Scholar
Guthman, J. (2012). Opening Up the Black Box of the Body in Geographical Obesity Research: Toward a Critical Political Ecology of Fat. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 951–57.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. and Livingston, I. (1995). Introduction: Posthuman Bodies. In Halberstam, J. and Livingston, I., eds., Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. and Livingston, I. (eds.). (1995). Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, G. (2012). “There Are No Digital Humanities,” In Gold, Matthew K. and Klein, Lauren F. eds., Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 133–8.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (2001). Cultural Studies and Its Theoretical Legacies. In Leitch, V. B. et al., eds. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company, 1898–910.Google Scholar
Hall, S. Evans, J. and Nixon, S. (Eds). (2013). Representation, 2nd ed. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hames Garcia, M. (2008). How Real is Race? In Alaimo, S. and Hekman, S. J., eds., Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 308–39.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–65.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2008). Companion Species, Mis-Recognition, and Queer Worlding. In Giffney, N. and Hird, M. J., eds., Queering the Non/Human. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, xxiii–xxvi.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: NY: Routledge, 149–81.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Manifestly Haraway. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (1990). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, NY: Routledge, 183–202.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene. In Moore, J., ed., Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 34–76.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Tentacular Thinking: Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Cthulucene. E-Flux, 75 (September). Online.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. and Endy, D. (2019). Tools for Multispecies Futures. The Journal of Design and Science, 4. Online.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Ropley, Hants: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (2012). The Well-Wrought Broken Hammer: Object-Oriented Literary Criticism. New Literary History, 43(2), 183–203.Google Scholar
Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? The Georgia Review, 31(4), 830–50.Google Scholar
Hauser, J. (2006). Biotechnology as Mediality: Strategies of Organic Media Art. Performance Research, 11(4), 129–36.Google Scholar
Hauser, J. (2003). Genes, Geneies, Genes, trans. J. Hauser. L’Art Biotech Catalogue. Trézélan, France: Filigranes Editions, 9.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (2005). My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (2006). Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere. Theory, Culture, and Society, 23(7–8), 159–66.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Unconscious. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2004). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature: Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, Part II, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1977). Letter on Humanism. In Farrell Krell, D., ed., Basic Writings. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 189–242.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 3–35.Google Scholar
Helmreich, S. (2014). Homo Microbis: The Human Microbiome, Figural, Literal, Political. Thresholds, 42, 52–59.Google Scholar
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Herbrechter, S. and Callus, I. (2003). What’s Wrong with Posthumanism? Rhizomes 7 (Fall). Online.Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2018). Narratology Beyond the Human: Storytelling and Animal Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
High, K. (2017). Press Release: Gut Love: Bacteria, Love and Immunology Intersect at Esther Klein Gallery Exhibit. Online.Google Scholar
Hinterberger, A. (2016). Regulating Estrangement: Human–animal Chimeras in Postgenomic Biology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1–22.Google Scholar
Hirch, M., and Spitzer, L. (2006). Testimonial Objects: Memory, Gender, and Transmission. Poetics Today, 27, 353–83.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E. (2018). Queering the Interspecies Encounter: Yoko Tawada’s Memoirs of a Polar Bear. In Driscoll, K. and Hoffman, E., eds, What Is Zoopoetics? Texts, Bodies, Entanglement. Hoffmann. New York: Palgrave, 149–65.Google Scholar
Holtzman, N. (1999). Are Genetic Tests Adequately Regulated? Science 286(5439), 409–10.Google Scholar
Hustak, C. and Myers, N. (2012). Involutionary Momentum: Affective Ecologies and the Sciences of Plant/Insect Encounters. Differences, 23(2), 74–118.Google Scholar
Idema, T. (2019). Stages of Transmutation: Science Fiction, Biology, and Environmental Posthumanism. New York, NY: Routledge, ebook.Google Scholar
Inda, J. X. (2014). Racial Prescriptions: Pharmaceuticals, Difference, and the Politics of Life. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Iovino, S. and Opperman, S. (2014). Introduction: Stories Come to Matter. In Iovino, S. and Opperman, S., eds., Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Z. I. (2020). Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Z. I. Losing Manhood: Animality and Plasticity in the (Neo)Slave Narrative. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 25 (1–2), 95–136.Google Scholar
Jackson, Z. I. (2015). Out Worlds: The Persistence of Race in Movement “Beyond the Human.” In the “Theorizing Queer Inhumanisms” Dossier. GLQ, 21(2–3), 209–48.Google Scholar
Jackson, Z. I. (2015). Outer Worlds: The Persistence of Race in Movement “Beyond the Human.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2), 215–18.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. New York, NY: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1981). The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–94.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. In Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S. H., eds., Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1–33.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2011). Introduction: Rewriting Life, Reframing Rights. In Jasanoff, S., ed., Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Jones, Brandon. (2018). Mattering. In Braidotti, R. and Hlavajova, M., eds., The Posthuman Glossary. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 244–45.Google Scholar
Jonze, S. (Director). (2013). Her [Motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Annapurna Pictures.Google Scholar
Kac, E. (ed.). (2006). Signs of Life: Bio Art and Beyond. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. (2012). Race in a Bottle: The Story of BiDil and Racialized Medicine in a Post-genomic Age. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kalogridis, L. (Creator). (2018-). Altered Carbon [Web television series]. Los Gatos, CA: Netflix Inc.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. K. Smith. London, UK: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. (2018). Aerial Aftermaths: Wartime from Above. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. (2002). Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kember, S. and Zylinska, J. (2012). Life after New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
King, T. L. (2017). Humans Involved: Lurking in the Lines of Posthumanist Flight. Critical Ethnic Studies, 3(1), 162–85.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs the Climate. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Kolozova, K. and Joy, E. A.. (2016). After the “Speculative Turn”: Realism, Philosophy, and Feminism. New York, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
Kordela, A. K. (2016). Monsters of Biopower: Terror(ism) and Horror in the Era of Affect. Philosophy Today, 60(1),193–205.Google Scholar
Kroker, A. (2012). Body Drift: Butler, Hayles, Haraway. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krupar, S. R. (2018). Green Death: Sustainability and the Administration of the Dead. Cultural Geographies, 25(2), 267–84.Google Scholar
Krupar, S. R. and Ehlers, N. (2017). Biofutures: Race and the Governance of Health. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(2), 222–40.Google Scholar
Krupar, S. R. and Ehlers, N (2015). Target: Biomedicine and Racialized Geo-body-politics. Occasion, 8, 1–25.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (1999). The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (2006). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kuzniar, A. (2006). Melancholia’s Dog: Reflections on Our Animal Kinship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1998). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI, trans. A. Sheridan. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (2002). The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience. In Écrits, trans. B. Fink. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 75–81.Google Scholar
Landecker, H. (2007). Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Landecker, H. (2015). Sociology in an Age of Genomic Instability: Copy Number Variation, Somatic Mosaicism, and the Fallen Genome. Advances in Medical Sociology, (16), 157–86.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the Love of Technology, trans. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leicester, H. M. (1971). The Historical Background of Chemistry. New York, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Leong, D. (2016). The Mattering of Black Lives: Octavia Butler’s Hyperempathy and the Promise of New Materialism. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 2(2), 1–35.Google Scholar
Lerner, B. H. (2003). The Breast Cancer Wars: Hope, Fear, and the Pursuit of a Cure in Twentieth-Century America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and Speech. Trans. A. Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levine, K. (Director). (2007). BioShock [Video game]. Westwood, MA, and Canberra, AU: 2 K Boston and 2 K Australia.Google Scholar
Li, Y. (2018). These CRISPR-modified Crops Don’t Count as GMOs. The Conversation, 22 May. Online. https://theconversation.com/these-crispr-modified-crops-dont-count-as-gmos-96002Google Scholar
Lilly, K. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life?: A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lippit, A. M. (2017). Therefore, the Animal that Saw Derrida. In Weinstein, J. and Colebrook, C., eds., Posthumous Life: Theorizing Beyond the Posthuman. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 87–104.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. (2019). Under Representation: The Racial Regime of Aesthetics. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Lock, M. (2001). The Alienation of Body Tissue and the Biopolitics of Immortalized Cell Lines. Body and Society, 7(2–3), 63–91.Google Scholar
Lock, M. (2013). The Epigenome and Nature/Nurture Reunification: A Challenge for Anthropology. Medical Anthropology, 32(4), 291–308.Google Scholar
Losh, E. and Wernimont, J. (2018). “Introduction.” Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, ix-xxv.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J., with Appleyard, B. (2019). Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, L. (2015). The Intimacies of Four Continents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. (2015). Buñuel’s Bull Meets YouTube’s Lion: Surrealist and Digital Posthumanisms. In Lawrence, M. and McMahon, L., eds., Animal Life and the Moving Image. London, UK: British Film Institute, 58–71.Google Scholar
Luciano, D. and Chen, M. Y. (2015). Has the Queer Ever Been Human? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3): 183–207.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems, trans. J. Bednarz, Jr., with D. Baecker. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lundblad, M. (2017). Introduction: The End of the Animal–Literary and Cultural Animalities. In Lundblad, M., ed., Animalities: Literary and Cultural Studies Beyond the Human. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. (1988–89). Can Thought Go On Without a Body?, trans. B. Boone and L. Hildreth. Discourse 11(1), 74–87.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. (1991) The Inhuman: Reflections of Time, trans. G. Bennington and R. Bowlby. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. (1992). The Postmodern Explained: Correspondence 1982–1985, ed. Pefanis, J. and Thomas, M.. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. (2001). Postmodern Fable, trans. Georges Van Den Abeele. In Malpass, S., ed., Postmodern Debates. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 12–21.Google Scholar
Mahon, P. (2017). Posthumanism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Malabou, C. (2005). The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, and Dialectic. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manning, E. (2013). Always More than One: Individuation’s Dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, E and Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, B. (2017). Folded Futurity: Epigenetic Plasticity, Temporality, and New Figures of Fetal Life. Science as Culture, 26(3),355–79.Google Scholar
Mansfield, B. and Gutman, J. (2015). Epigenetic Life: Biological Plasticity, Abnormality, and New Configurations of Race and Reproduction. Cultural Geographies, 22(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Marks, L.U. (2002). Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Martinon, J.-P. (2007). On Futurity: Malabou, Derrida and Nancy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, F. (2015). Moral Ambiguities in the Politics of Climate Change. In Nanda, V., ed., Climate Change and Environmental Ethics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers, 43–64.Google Scholar
Matthews, B. (2011). Schelling’s Organic Form of Philosophy: Life as the Schema of Freedom. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. M. and Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
McCorduck, P. (2004). Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry Into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence, 2nd ed. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters/CRC Press.Google Scholar
McCormack, D. (2018). Atmospheric Things: On the Allure of Elemental Envelopment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Online.Google Scholar
McHugh, S. and Marvin, G. Human-Animal Studies: Global Perspectives. In McHugh, S. and Marvin, G., eds., Human-Animal Studies, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–16.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Q. (2008). After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency, trans. R. Brassier. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Q. (2011). Excerpts from L’Inexistence divine. In Harman, G., Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the Making. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh Press, 175–238.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Q. (2015). Science Fiction and Extro-Science Fiction, trans. Alyosha Edlebi. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
Meloni, M. (2015). Epigenetics for the Social Sciences: Justice, Embodiment, and Inheritance in the Postgenomic Age. New Genetics and Society, 34(2), 125–51.Google Scholar
Meloni, M. (2019). Impressionable Biologies: From the Archaeology of Plasticity to the Sociology of Epigenetics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milburn, C. (2015). Mondo Nano: Fun and Games in the World of Digital Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Milburn, C. (2008). Nanovision: Engineering the Future. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, E. and Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2019). Thinking with Interdependence: From Economy/Environment to Ecological Livelihoods. In Bennett, J. and Zournazi, M., eds., Thinking in the World: A Reader. New York, NY: Bloomsbury, 314–340.Google Scholar
Million. (2017). Indigenous Matters. In Alaimo, S., ed., Gender: Matter. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan, 95–110.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. T., Antebi, S. and Snyder, S. L. (2019). Introduction. In Mitchell, D., Antebi, S., and Snyder, S.L., eds., The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1–37.Google Scholar
Moore, J. (2016). Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? In Moore, J., ed., Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Moravec, H. (1988). Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
More, M. (1998). The Extropian Principles Version 3.0: A Transhumanist Declaration. Extropy Institute. Online.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. New York, NY: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Moylan, T. (1986). Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. New York, NY: Methuen.Google Scholar
Müller, A. and Müller, K. H. (eds.). (2007). An Unfinished Revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory/BCL 1958–1976. Vienna, AT: Echoraum.Google Scholar
Murphie, A. (2018). On Being Affected: Feeling in the Folding of Multiple Catastrophes. Cultural Studies, 32(1), 18–42.Google Scholar
Narkunas, J. P. (2018). Reified Life: Speculative Capital and the Ahuman Condition. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Neimanis, A. (2017). Bodies of Water: Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Nichanian, M. and Kazanjian, D. (2003). Between Genocide and Catastrophe. In Eng, D. and Kazanjian, D., eds., Loss: The Politics of Mourning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 125–47.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1979). On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense. In Breazeale, Daniel, ed., Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870s. New York, NY: Humanity Books, 79–97.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (2006). Thus Spoke Zarathustra, ed. Pippin, R., trans. Caro, A.D.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1968). The Will to Power, trans. W. Kaufmann. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. and Joy, L. (Creators). (2016-). Westworld [Television series]. New York, NY: Home Box Office (HBO) Inc.Google Scholar
Nowviskie, B. (2016). On the Origin of “Hack” and “Yack.” In Gold, M.K. and Klein, L.F., eds., Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Online.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, M. (2006). E-Crit: Digital Media, Critical Theory, and the Humanities. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ohrem, D. (2017). An Address from Elsewhere: Vulnerability, Relationality, and Conceptions of Creaturely Embodiment. In Ohrem, D. and Bartosch, R., eds., Beyond the Human-Animal Divide: Creaturely Lives in Literature and Culture. New York, NY: Palgrave, 43–75.Google Scholar
Pálsson, G. (2009). Biosocial Relations of Production. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 51(2), 288–313.Google Scholar
Parikka, Jussi. (2015). The Anthrobscene. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press, ebook.Google Scholar
Parikka, J. and Hertz, G. (2015). Zombie Media: Circuit Bending Media Archaeology into an Art Method.” In A Geology of Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 141–53.Google Scholar
Paxson, H. Post-Pasteurian Cultures: The Microbiopolitics of Raw-Milk Cheese in the United States. Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), 15–47.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, R. and Bongard, J. (2007). How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pfister, W. (Director). (2014). Transcendence [Motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Alcon Entertainment.Google Scholar
Pias, C. (ed.). (2016). The Macy Conferences 1946–53: The Complete Transactions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pick, A. (2011). Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (2011). The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pilsch, A. (2017). Transhumanism: Evolutionary Futurism and the Human Technologies of Utopia. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Planck, M. (1970). The Unity of the Physical World-Picture. In Toulmin, S., ed., Physical Reality: Philosophical Essays on 20th Century Physics. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1–27.Google Scholar
Pollock, A. (2012). Medicating Race: Heart Disease and Durable Preoccupations with Difference. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, E. A. (2016). Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Prainsack, B. and Buyx, A. (2017). Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puar, J. K. (2017). Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Raley, R. (2014). Digital Humanities for the Next Five Minutes. differences 25(1),26–45.Google Scholar
Ramsay, S. and Rockwell, G. (2012). Developing Things: Notes toward an Epistemology of Building in the Digital Humanities. In Gold, M.K., ed., Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 75–84.Google Scholar
Rattansi, P. and Clericuzio, A. (2013). Alchemy and Chemistry in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Raulerson, J. (2013). Singularities: Technoculture, Transhumanism, and Science Fiction in the Twenty-first Century. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Resch, G., Southwick, D., Record, I. and Ratto, M. (2018). Thinking as Handwork: Critical Making with Humanistic Concerns. In Sayers, J., ed., Making Things and Drawing Boundaries. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 140–9.Google Scholar
Rhee, J. (2018). The Robot Imaginary: The Human and the Price of Dehumanized Labor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. (2018). Climate Trauma, or the Affects of the Catastrophe to Come. Environmental Humanities 10(1),1–19.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. (2016). Gestures of Testimony: Torture, Trauma, and Affect in Literature. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Rigney, A. and Erll, A. (eds.). (2009). Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ripple, W. J., et al. (2014). Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores. Science, 343 (6167), 1241484.Online.Google Scholar
Risam, R. (2018). What Passes for Human? In Losh, E. and Wernimont, J., eds., Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 39–56.Google Scholar
Robinson, K. S. (2015). Our Generation Ships Will Sink. Boing Boing (November 16). Online.Google Scholar
Rockwell, G. (1999). In Humanities Computing an Academic Discipline? Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities. OnlineGoogle Scholar
Roelvink, G. (2016). Building Dignified Worlds: Geographies of Collective Action. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Roelvink, G. (2018). Community Economies and Climate Justice. In Jacobson, S., ed., Climate Justice and the Economy: Social Mobilization, Knowledge and the Political. New York, NY: Routledge, 129–147.Google Scholar
Roelvink, G. (2015). Performing Posthumanist Economies in the Anthropocene. In Roelvink, G., Martin, K. St., and Gibson-Graham, J. K., eds., Making Other Worlds Possible: Performing Diverse Economies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 225–43.Google Scholar
Roelvink, G. and Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2009). A Postcapitalist Politics of Dwelling. Australian Humanities Review, 46, 145–58.Google Scholar
Roelvink, G. and Gibson-Graham, J. K and Zolkos, M. (2011). Climate Change as Experience of Affect. Angelaki, 16(4), 43–57.Google Scholar
Roelvink, G. and Gibson-Graham, J. K and Zolkos, M (2015). Posthumanist Perspectives on Affect. Angelaki, 20(3), 1–20.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2013). The Human Sciences in a Biological Age. Theory, Culture, and Society, 30(1), 3–34.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty- first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, A. (1991). Strange Weather: Culture, Science and Technology in the Age of Limits New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Ruccio, D. (2017). Capitalocene. Occasional Links & Commentary on Economics, Culture and Society. Online.Google Scholar
Rutsky, R.L. (2017). Technologies. In Clarke, B. and Rossini, M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 182–95.Google Scholar
Ryan, D. (2015). Animal Theory: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Saldaña-Portillo, M. J. (2016). Indian Given: Racial Geographies across Mexico and the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sayers, J. (2017). Making Things and Drawing Boundaries. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, J. S. (2017). The Anthropocene Controversy. In Grusin, R., ed., Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 169–95.Google Scholar
Schuster, J. (2016). On Reading Christian Bök’s The Xenotext: Book 1 Ten Thousand Years Later. Jacket 2. Online.Google Scholar
Scott, R. (Director). 1982. Blade Runner [Motion picture]. Burbank, CA: Warner Brothers.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay is About You. In Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 123–51.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Senior, A. (2014). Relics of Bioart: Ethics and Messianic Aesthetics in Performance Documentation. Theatre Journal, 66(2), 183–205.Google Scholar
Shaviro, S. (2014). The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shevlin, H., Vold, K., Crosby, M. and Halina, M. (2019). The Limits of Machine Intelligence. EMBO reports 20(10), e49177.Google Scholar
Shklovskii, I. S. and Sagan, C. (1966). Intelligent Life in the Universe. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2014). Native Studies at the Horizon of Death: Theorizing Ethnographic Entrapment and Settler Self-Reflexivity. In Simpson, A. and Smith, A., eds., Theorizing Native Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Snelders, H. A. M. (1970). Romanticism and Naturphilosophie and the Inorganic Natural Sciences, 1797–1840: An Introductory Survey. Studies in Romanticism, 9(3), 193–215.Google Scholar
Sorenson, J. (2014). Introduction: Thinking the Unthinkable. In Sorenson, J., ed., Critical Animal Studies: Thinking the Unthinkable. Toronto, ON: Canada Scholars’ Press, xi–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Spahr, J. (2005). This Connection of Everything with Lungs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Springgay, S. and Truman, S. E.. (2018). Walking Methodologies in a More-than-Human World: WalkingLab. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Squier, S. M. (2004). Liminal Lives: Imagining the Human at the Frontiers of Biomedicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stallwood, K. (2014). Animal Rights: Moral Crusade or Social Movement? In Sorenson, J., Critical Animal Studies: Thinking the Unthinkable. Toronto, ON: Canada Scholars’ Press, 298–317.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., et al. (2018). Perspective: Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. PNAS Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(33), 8252–59.Google Scholar
Steinbock, E. (2019). Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sterling, B. (1988). Preface. In Sterling, Bruce, ed., Mirrorshades: The Cyberpunk Anthology. New York, NY: Ace Books, ix–xvi.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. (2011). Atmospheric Attunements. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29 (3), 445–53.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time I: The Fault of Epimetheus, trans. R. Beardsworth and G. Collins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stracey, F. (1985). Bio-Art: The Ethics Behind the Aesthetics. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 10, 496–500.Google Scholar
Sturrock, J. (ed.). (1979). Structuralism and Since: From Lévi-Strauss to Derrida. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. (2015). The Physiology of Sexist and Racist Oppression. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunder Rajan, K. (2017). Pharmocracy: Value, Politics, and Knowledge in Global Biomedicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Suvin, D. (1988). Positions and Presuppositions in Science Fiction. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Tallbear, K. (2017). Beyond the Life/Not-Life Binary: A Feminist Indigenous Reading of Cryopreservation, Interspecies Thinking, and the New Materialisms. In Radin, J. and Kowal, E., eds., Cryopolitics: Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 179–201.Google Scholar
Tallbear, K. (2013). Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tamminen, S. and Vermeulen, N. (2019). Bio-objects: New Conjugations of the Living. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, 21(50), 156–79.Google Scholar
Thacker, E. (2006). The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tinker, G. (2004). The Stones Shall Cry Out: Consciousness, Rocks, and Indians. Wicazo Sa Review, 19(2), 105–25.Google Scholar
Tiptree, J., Jr. (2004). The Girl Who Was Plugged In. In Smith, J., ed., Her Smoke Rose Up Forever. San Francisco, CA: Tachyon Publications, 43–78.Google Scholar
Todd, Z. (2014). An Indigenous Feminist’s Take On the Ontological Turn: “Ontology” Is Just Another Word for Colonialism. Urbane Adventurer: Amiskwacî. Online.Google Scholar
Trop, G. (2018). The Indifference of the Inorganic. In Landgraf, E., Trop, G. and Weatherby, L., eds., Posthumanism in the Age of Humanism: Mind, Matter, and the Life Sciences after Kant. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tsang, M. (2017). Open Source Estrogen: From Biomolecules to Biopolitics … Hormones with Institutional Biopower! Unpublished MSc Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Online.Google Scholar
Tsing, A., Swanson, J., Gan, E. and Bubandt, N. (2017). Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, N. (2008). Viscous Porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In Alaimo, S. and Hekman, S., Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 188–213.Google Scholar
Van der Tuin, I. (2018). New/New Materialism. In Braidotti, R. and Hlavajova, M., eds., The Posthuman Glossary. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 277–78.Google Scholar
VanderMeer, J. (2014). Area X: The Southern Reach Trilogy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, P. (Director). (1987). RoboCop [Motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Orion Pictures.Google Scholar
Vermulen, P. and Richter, V. (2015). Introduction: Creaturely Constellations. European Journal of English Studies, 19(9), 1–9.Google Scholar
Vinge, V. (1993). The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in a Post-Human Era. Presented at NASA Vision-21 Symposium. Online.Google Scholar
Vint, S. (2010). Animal Alterity: Science Fiction and the Question of the Animal. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Vint, S. (2007). Bodies of Tomorrow: Technology, Subjectivity, and Science Fiction. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Vint, S. (2019). Long Live the New Flesh: Race and the Posthuman in Westworld. In Goody, A. and Mackay, A., eds., Reading Westworld. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 141–60.Google Scholar
von Foerster, H. (1990). Cybernetics. In Shapiro, S. C., ed., Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, Vol.1. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 225–26.Google Scholar
Vora, K. and Atanasoski, N. (2019). Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wainwrigth, J. and Mann, G. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London, UK: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Waldby, C. (2002). Stem Cells, Tissue Cultures and the Production of Biovalue. Health, 6(3), 305–23.Google Scholar
Waldby, C. and Mitchell, R. (2006). Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Warwick, C. (2016). Building Theories or Theories of Building? A Tension at the Heart of Digital Humanities. In Schreibman, S., Siemens, R. and Unsworth, J., eds., A New Companion to Digital Humanities. West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 538–52.Google Scholar
Weasel, L. H. (2016). Embodying Intersectionality: The Promise and (and Peril) of Epigenetics for Feminist Science Studies. In Pitts-Taylor, V., ed., Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Materialism. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, J. (2009). Murray River Country: An Ecological Dialogue with Traditional Owners. Canberra, ACT: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Z. (2014). The Trouble with Posthumanism: Bacteria are People Too. In Sorenson, J., ed., Critical Animal Studies: Thinking the Unthinkable. Toronto, ON: Canada Scholars’ Press, 93–116.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1988). The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Wilbert, C. (2006). What Is Doing the Killing? Animal Attacks, Man-Eaters, and Shifting Boundaries and Flows of Human-Animal Relations. In The Animal Studies Group, ed., Killing Animals. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 30–49.Google Scholar
Willems, B. (2010). Facticity, Poverty and Clones: On Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. New York, NY: Atropos Press.Google Scholar
Willems, B. (2017). Speculative Realism and Science Fiction. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Willey, A. (2016). A World of Materialisms: Postcolonial Feminist Science Studies and the New Natural. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(6), 991–1014.Google Scholar
Williams, J. J. (2009). Donna Haraway’s Critters. Chronicle of Higher Education (18 October). Online.Google Scholar
Williams, J. J. (2009–2010). Science Stories: An Interview with Donna J. Haraway. The Minnesota Review, (73–74), 133–63.Google Scholar
Wills, David. 2008. Dorsality: Thinking Back Through Technology and Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wöhler, F. (1828). Ueber künstliche Bildung des Harnstoffs. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 88(2), 253–56.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2003). Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2013). Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2008). Exposures. In Cavell, Stanley, et al., eds., Philosophy and Animal Life. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1–41.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2009). Human, All Too Human: “Animal Studies” and the Humanities. PMLA 124(2), 564–75.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2010). Introduction. In What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press, xi–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2006). Thinking Other-Wise: Cognitive Science, Deconstruction, and the (Non)Speaking (Non)Human Animal Subject. In Castricano, J., ed., Animal Subjects: An Ethical Reader in a Posthuman World. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 125–43.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2010). What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wright, L. (2015). The Vegan Studies Project: Food, Animals, and Gender in the Age of Terror. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Wynter, S. Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation–An Argument.” CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.Google Scholar
Young, R. (ed.). (1981). Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. E. (2009). Religious Motifs in Technological Posthumanism. Western Humanities Review, 63(3), 67–83.Google Scholar
Zirra, M. (2017). Shelf Lives: Nonhuman Agency and Seamus Heaney’s Vibrant Memory Objects. Parallax, 23(4), 458–73.Google Scholar
Zurr, I. and Catts, O. (2014). The Unnatural Relations between Artistic Research and Ethics Committees: An Artist’s Perspective. In Macneill, P. U., ed., The Arts and Ethic, Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Zylinska, J. (2010). Playing God, Playing Adam: The Politics and Ethics of Enhancement. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 7(2), 149–61.Google Scholar